Like 90% of the female population I was avidly awaiting the new version of Poldark. I remember loving the first series many years ago but fortunately didn't remember much about the story. I read the Winston Graham books, but again so long ago I have no recollection the plot – apart from I seem to remember Ross becomes an MP in the last book.
Aiden Turner certainly doesn't disappoint – he's an excellent actor and has to be the best looking lead on television at the moment. Demelza is equally attractive – funny, but I can't remember the name of the young woman who plays her. Indeed, I cannot criticize the acting, the setting or the costumes.
I'm sure you sense there is a big 'but' coming– and here are the reasons I am disappointed in the BBC production.
1. Ross is supposedly penniless but by last Sunday's episode he was the proud possessor of not only a carriage, but three different black horses.
2. Verity arrived for a prolonged visit with a trunk the size of a briefcase – what was all that about? Also on the luggage front Demelza and Ross took no luggage when they went to stay for Christmas but mysteriously a new gown arrived which Demelza then abandoned the next day.
3. Ross had a carriage – why on earth didn't he use it to take Demelza for her first overnight visit at the big house?
4. If the mines and the big house were within walking distance, why did Ross gallop hither and yon on so many occasions?
5. When Ross and Demelza galloped to help with the pilchards they were seen walking home without their horse. On one occasion he actually galloped home in the same direction as he galloped away.
6. Demelza's pregnancy: she announced that she was pregnant in September – in those days she wouldn't have known for certain until she was at least two months – then she is only just experiencing morning sickness, has a waist like wasp, three months later when she should have been at least five months pregnant.
7. Elizabeth's baby has remained a babe in arms – is there something wrong with the poor little thing that we don't know about? He should now be sitting up and taking an interest.
8. Demelza's dancing – we all know that she is an awkward young woman – but really! Why make her look as though she has a pair of feet like kippers.
9. The head of the household kicked the bucket and it's as if he had never existed – in those days the house would have gone into black and there would be no parties or celebrations for a minimum of six months.
10. It wasn't until Victorian times that gentlewomen attended funerals – of course, it might have been different in the wilds of Cornwall – but I doubt it.
11. The final and most ridiculous incident was the arrival of the villains and their partners unannounced, "we were just passing by and called in," on Christmas Eve!! Good grief! We wouldn't do this in the 21st-century, let alone in the 18th when etiquette was everything. Surely somebody must have checked these facts?
There – I've dared to speak ill of the Poldark. The BBC's production/direction are to blame for these appalling inconsistencies and historical errors and I cannot fathom why more effort wasn't put into this production.
They have a superb cast and the script is okay - but I can't be the only one who is irritated beyond measure by the sloppy production values. I will still watch the programme twice – once in the morning on my own and again with my husband in the evening, but some of the gloss has definitely gone for me.
What do you think? Will I now get hate mail and a storm of abuse? :)
Actually, Fenella, I adore Poldark but you've made totally valid points. I noticed a few of those errors myself, but managed to push them out of my mind so I could concentrate on the gorgeous...scenery.
ReplyDeleteI do think these things should have been checked and I'm beginning to wonder if the BBC thinks it's found a winning formula - supplying us with rather fabulous men with lovely hair and wearing great costumes and hoping that will be enough.
Though, in the case of Poldark, pperhaps it is. For now at least. :-)
I also love it -wouldn't watch twice if I didn't. However BBC should take more care with editing and continuity. Glorious 'scenery' will always sell a programme here and overseas.
ReplyDeleteThe coach was not Ross's. If you've read the books you'd know that you could hire a local coach much like calling a taxi. The new gown was sent to Trenwith by the dressmaker (Demelza explained this) and Im sure was brought over later to Nampara by servants. Also horses were the mode of transportation, sometimes you feel like walking, sometimes you don't. I think you are confusing two different occasions, though, the Christmas at Trenwith R & D walked home. The Warleggan's ball they attented they took the hired coach along with Francis and Elizabeth.
ReplyDeleteThe coach was not Ross's. If you've read the books you'd know that you could hire a local coach much like calling a taxi. The new gown was sent to Trenwith by the dressmaker (Demelza explained this) and Im sure was brought over later to Nampara by servants. Also horses were the mode of transportation, sometimes you feel like walking, sometimes you don't. I think you are confusing two different occasions, though, the Christmas at Trenwith R & D walked home. The Warleggan's ball they attented they took the hired coach along with Francis and Elizabeth.
ReplyDeleteAnnie L - I haven't read the books and my comments were based on what I saw on the TV version. A programme should work without the viewer having read the books -and this episode didn't. thanks for your comments.
ReplyDelete